GRE寫作部分將重點考察考生有針對性地對具體考題做出反應(yīng)的能力，而非要求考生堆砌泛泛的文字。具體說來，這些重點關(guān)注的能力包括：1、 清楚有效地闡明復(fù)雜觀點；2、 用貼切的事理和事例支撐觀點；3、考察/驗證他人論點及其相關(guān)論證；4、支撐一個有針對性的連貫的討論；5、控制標準書面英語的各個要素。寫作部分將聯(lián)合考察邏輯推理和分析寫作兩種技能，并且將加大力度引進那些需要考生做出有針對性的回應(yīng)的考題，降低考生依賴事前準備（如背誦）的材料的可能性。
3
The technological tools we as a society have developed are not in themselves positive or negative, they are just that, tools.
The uses, however, are definitely a different story. Computers, I believe at one time, were developed to save us time.
Do our work more quickly for us so that we could have more leisure time to spend doing those things we enjoy.
We have found now, especially those of us that are parents, that all of the leisure time we have gained is either spent watching our children learn things on the computer or creating our own unique something on the family computer.
For one thing, it has become a very fun item, the computers have become more than just work related technological tools.
The amount of human interaction is limited, because people in general are spending much of their leisure time doing solo on the computer.
In the past, it was common for the new young exectutive to get a membership to the exercise club as a perk, where he could socialize with the upper crust.
Now the new young exec. gets a car phone or a portable fax, so that he can work from whereever he is, usually doing that solo trip to somewhere.
Given these as examples, I would tend to agree with the statement that lonliness has increased as a direct result.
評價
This response is limited in both its analysis of the issue and its control of language.
The writer clearly expresses the idea that "the technological tools we as a society have developed are not in themselves positive or negative."
However, the essay provides only limited support for the position; the two examples are loosely connected and undeveloped.
At times the organization of the essay makes for confusing reading.
For example, the relevance of the "young executive" example is not clear because there is no transition from the preceding example of the computer.
The conclusion, one sentence long, simply restates the claim made in the topic.
The awkward sentences are evidence of a limited fluency.
Greater use of compound sentences could help eliminate structural problems and facilitate the communication of ideas (e.g., sentences 3 and 4 could be combined).
For all of these reasons, the essay received a score of 3.
感謝您閱讀《issue官方范文(一)7 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
3
The technological tools we as a society have developed are not in themselves positive or negative, they are just that, tools.
The uses, however, are definitely a different story. Computers, I believe at one time, were developed to save us time.
Do our work more quickly for us so that we could have more leisure time to spend doing those things we enjoy.
We have found now, especially those of us that are parents, that all of the leisure time we have gained is either spent watching our children learn things on the computer or creating our own unique something on the family computer.
For one thing, it has become a very fun item, the computers have become more than just work related technological tools.
The amount of human interaction is limited, because people in general are spending much of their leisure time doing solo on the computer.
In the past, it was common for the new young exectutive to get a membership to the exercise club as a perk, where he could socialize with the upper crust.
Now the new young exec. gets a car phone or a portable fax, so that he can work from whereever he is, usually doing that solo trip to somewhere.
Given these as examples, I would tend to agree with the statement that lonliness has increased as a direct result.
評價
This response is limited in both its analysis of the issue and its control of language.
The writer clearly expresses the idea that "the technological tools we as a society have developed are not in themselves positive or negative."
However, the essay provides only limited support for the position; the two examples are loosely connected and undeveloped.
At times the organization of the essay makes for confusing reading.
For example, the relevance of the "young executive" example is not clear because there is no transition from the preceding example of the computer.
The conclusion, one sentence long, simply restates the claim made in the topic.
The awkward sentences are evidence of a limited fluency.
Greater use of compound sentences could help eliminate structural problems and facilitate the communication of ideas (e.g., sentences 3 and 4 could be combined).
For all of these reasons, the essay received a score of 3.
感謝您閱讀《issue官方范文(一)7 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。