GRE考試形式：中國大陸地區(qū)、香港、澳門、韓國目前執(zhí)行分開考試的形式。由機考（分析性寫作）和筆試（語文、數學）組成。
192
Secondly, the 300 people in the study are not necessarily representative of the state’s
general population – in terms of their susceptibility to health problems. For example, perhaps
nearly all of these people are adults, while most of the health problems associated with trash
sites occur among children. Or perhaps preventative health-care programs in these particular
communities are unusually effective in preventing ealth problems. In short, lacking evidence
that these 300 people are typical in terms of their vulnerability to health problems the Council
cannot convince me that no statewide trash-site regulations are needed.
Thirdly, the Council’s conclusions that the five sites studies pose no serious health hazards
to nearby residents seems premature. Common sense informs me that a serious health
problem might become apparent only after a long period of exposure to the environmental
cause of the problem. The Council fails to take into account the length of time these residents
have been exposed to the conditions created by the trash sites; and in any event, one “recent”
study amounts to scant evidence that the sites pose no significant long-term public-health
hazards.
In sum, the Council’s argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen it the Council
must provide better evidence that the environmental conditions at the five sites studies
represent conditions at trash sites througouth the state, and that the 300 people studies are
representative of state residents generally in terms of vulnerability to health problems. To
better assess the argument I would need more information comparing the health of the 300
people studied before and after continual exposure to the environmental conditions associated
with the trash sites. I would also need to know the length of the study to determine whether it
adequately accounted for latent health problems. 感謝您閱讀《GRE作文范文大全（114） 》一文，出國留學網(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
192
Secondly, the 300 people in the study are not necessarily representative of the state’s
general population – in terms of their susceptibility to health problems. For example, perhaps
nearly all of these people are adults, while most of the health problems associated with trash
sites occur among children. Or perhaps preventative health-care programs in these particular
communities are unusually effective in preventing ealth problems. In short, lacking evidence
that these 300 people are typical in terms of their vulnerability to health problems the Council
cannot convince me that no statewide trash-site regulations are needed.
Thirdly, the Council’s conclusions that the five sites studies pose no serious health hazards
to nearby residents seems premature. Common sense informs me that a serious health
problem might become apparent only after a long period of exposure to the environmental
cause of the problem. The Council fails to take into account the length of time these residents
have been exposed to the conditions created by the trash sites; and in any event, one “recent”
study amounts to scant evidence that the sites pose no significant long-term public-health
hazards.
In sum, the Council’s argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen it the Council
must provide better evidence that the environmental conditions at the five sites studies
represent conditions at trash sites througouth the state, and that the 300 people studies are
representative of state residents generally in terms of vulnerability to health problems. To
better assess the argument I would need more information comparing the health of the 300
people studied before and after continual exposure to the environmental conditions associated
with the trash sites. I would also need to know the length of the study to determine whether it
adequately accounted for latent health problems. 感謝您閱讀《GRE作文范文大全（114） 》一文，出國留學網(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。