Gre寫作是美國所有作文考試中時(shí)刻最長而質(zhì)量要求最高的一類作文考試，而在短期內(nèi)提高gre寫作能力不是一天兩天可以完成額，所以我們?cè)趥淇?011新gre寫作時(shí)必然要對(duì)問題問題深切的剖析，體味以下優(yōu)異范文的文章結(jié)構(gòu)，以提高新gre寫作的整體分?jǐn)?shù)。
Usually if the audience can identify with an actor, or situation, etc. the show will gain popularity.
Special effects make shows more interesting; but, if the plot is not acceptable, the show is usually doomed.
評(píng)價(jià)
This essay does not analyze the issue.
Unlike many other essays at the 1 score level, this response is fairly easy to read and has, more or less, an overall coherence.
The writer's position is that media have to "appeal to many people" in order "to become mainstream," and the brief discussion supports that position.
The essay was scored a 1 because it does not address the basic issue presented in the topic: do the media create or reflect the values of a society?
Readers are told to read supportively, but when a writer merely writes about something in the topic (in this case, "the media") and ignores the issue, the response will probably not earn higher than a 1.
Similarly, an essay that discusses only "values" (religion, for example, with no reference to media) or "a favorite television show" (with no reference to how television reflects or influences people's values), no matter how well written, could not earn a very high score.
The sentences are generally coherent, and the errors do not seriously interfere with meaning.
It is not the control of syntax or conventions per se that keeps this essay at the 1 level but, as noted above, the inability of the writer to clearly address the issue.
感謝您閱讀《issue官方范文(二)10 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
Usually if the audience can identify with an actor, or situation, etc. the show will gain popularity.
Special effects make shows more interesting; but, if the plot is not acceptable, the show is usually doomed.
評(píng)價(jià)
This essay does not analyze the issue.
Unlike many other essays at the 1 score level, this response is fairly easy to read and has, more or less, an overall coherence.
The writer's position is that media have to "appeal to many people" in order "to become mainstream," and the brief discussion supports that position.
The essay was scored a 1 because it does not address the basic issue presented in the topic: do the media create or reflect the values of a society?
Readers are told to read supportively, but when a writer merely writes about something in the topic (in this case, "the media") and ignores the issue, the response will probably not earn higher than a 1.
Similarly, an essay that discusses only "values" (religion, for example, with no reference to media) or "a favorite television show" (with no reference to how television reflects or influences people's values), no matter how well written, could not earn a very high score.
The sentences are generally coherent, and the errors do not seriously interfere with meaning.
It is not the control of syntax or conventions per se that keeps this essay at the 1 level but, as noted above, the inability of the writer to clearly address the issue.
感謝您閱讀《issue官方范文(二)10 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。