Text 3
Why do so many Americans distrust what they read in their newspapers? The American Society of Newspaper Editors is trying to answer this painful question. The organization is deep into a long selfanalysis known as the journalism credibility project.
Sad to say, this project has turned out to be mostly lowlevel findings about factual errors and spelling and grammar mistakes, combined with lots of headscratching puzzlement about what in the world those readers really want.
But the sources of distrust go way deeper. Most journalists learn to see the world through a set of standard templates （patterns）into which they plug each day’s events. In other words, there is a conventional story line in the newsroom culture that provides a backbone and a readymade narrative structure for otherwise confusing news.
There exists a social and cultural disconnect between journalists and their readers, which helps explain why the “standard templates” of the newsroom seem alien to many readers. In a recent survey, questionnaires were sent to reporters in five middlesize cities around the country, plus one large metropolitan area. Then residents in these communities were phoned at random and asked the same questions.
Replies show that compared with other Americans, journalists are more likely to live in upscale neighborhoods, have maids, own Mercedeses, and trade stocks, and they’re less likely to go to church, do volunteer work, or put down roots in a community.
Reporters tend to be part of a broadly defined social and cultural elite, so their work tends to reflect the conventional values of this elite. The astonishing distrust of the news media isn’t rooted in inaccuracy or poor reportorial skills but in the daily clash of world views between reporters and their readers.
This is an explosive situation for any industry, particularly a declining one. Here is a troubled business that keeps hiring employees whose attitudes vastly annoy the customers. Then it sponsors lots of symposiums and a credibility project dedicated to wondering why customers are annoyed and fleeing in large numbers. But it never seems to get around to noticing the cultural and class biases that so many former buyers are complaining about. If it did, it would open up its diversity program, now focused narrowly on race and gender, and look for reporters who differ broadly by outlook, values, education, and class.
59．What is the passage mainly about?
［A］needs of the readers all over the world
［B］causes of the public disappointment about newspapers
［C］origins of the declining newspaper industry
［D］aims of a journalism credibility project
60．The results of the journalism credibility project turned out to be .
［A］quite trustworthy［B］somewhat contradictory
［C］very illuminating［D］rather superficial
61．The basic problem of journalists as pointed out by the writer lies in their .
［A］working attitude［B］conventional lifestyle
［C］world outlook［D］educational background
62．Despite its efforts, the newspaper industry still cannot satisfy the readers owing to its .
［A］failure to realize its real problem ［B］tendency to hire annoying reporters
［C］likeliness to do inaccurate reporting［D］prejudice in matters of race and gender
核心詞匯：
astonish ［E5stCniF］vt.使驚訝，使吃驚
backbone［5bAkbEun］n.脊椎, 中樞, 骨干, 支柱, 意志力, 勇氣, 毅力, 決心,主干(back+bone)
bias［5baiEs］n./v.（使有）偏見,偏心,偏袒（bi 二+as 名詞后綴→有兩種觀點→偏見
contradictory［7kCntrE5diktEri］a.矛盾的，對立的（contradict反駁+ory形容詞后綴）
conventional［kEn5venFEnEl］a.慣例的,常規(guī)的（convention+al）newsroom（編輯室；閱覽室）←news+room。
credibility［9kredi5biliti］n.可信性(cred+ibility)，cred詞根“相信”（如credit→cred+it→信用），ibility名詞后綴“可……性”（如ability←a+（i）bility）
dedicate［5dedikeit］vt.奉獻;獻身于（de加強+dic說+ate動詞后綴→反復說→致力于）
elite［ei5li:t］n.<法>［集合名詞］精華;精銳;中堅分子（e出+lit=lig選+e 名詞后綴→選出的人→精英人物）
factual［5fAktFEl］a.事實的, 實際的
gender［5dVendE］n.（生理上的）性；（名詞、代詞等的）性（gen+der名詞后綴）
illuminating［i5lju:mi9neitiN］a.照明的；啟發(fā)的(illuminat（e）+ing形容詞后綴)，illuminate（照明；啟發(fā)）可看作illumin+ate，illumin諧音“一路明”，ate動詞后綴，“使”“一路明”→照明→引申為“啟發(fā)”。
metropolitan［metrE5pClitEn］a.首都的,主要都市的,大城市
plug［plQg］n.塞子,插頭v.堵,塞,插上,插栓
questionnaire［kwestFE5nZE］n.調(diào)查表，問卷（question+aire）
scratch［skrAtF］v.抓,搔,扒n.抓,搔,抓痕;起跑線
sponsor［5spCnsE］n.發(fā)起人,主辦,保證人v.發(fā)起,主辦(spons許諾+or名詞后綴→發(fā)起人；主辦方；保證人)
superficial［sju:pE5fiFEl］a.表面的;膚淺的,淺薄的（super在……上面+fic +ial形容詞后綴→在表面→膚淺的）
survey［sE:5vei］v./n.俯瞰,眺望;全面審視,調(diào)查;測量圖,勘定
symposium［sim5pEuzjEm］n.討論會; 專題論文，專題論文集(sym共同，相同+pos放+ium→放在一起討論→專題討論)
template［5templit］n.模板(templ（e）+ate)，temple寺廟，ate吃，當今傾向于素食者日益增多，而temple是ate素的“模板”（template）。
volunteer［9vClEn5tiE］n./v.自愿（者,兵）;自愿（提供）（volunt+eer人→意愿的人→志愿者）
Why do so many Americans distrust what they read in their newspapers? The American Society of Newspaper Editors is trying to answer this painful question. The organization is deep into a long selfanalysis known as the journalism credibility project.
Sad to say, this project has turned out to be mostly lowlevel findings about factual errors and spelling and grammar mistakes, combined with lots of headscratching puzzlement about what in the world those readers really want.
But the sources of distrust go way deeper. Most journalists learn to see the world through a set of standard templates （patterns）into which they plug each day’s events. In other words, there is a conventional story line in the newsroom culture that provides a backbone and a readymade narrative structure for otherwise confusing news.
There exists a social and cultural disconnect between journalists and their readers, which helps explain why the “standard templates” of the newsroom seem alien to many readers. In a recent survey, questionnaires were sent to reporters in five middlesize cities around the country, plus one large metropolitan area. Then residents in these communities were phoned at random and asked the same questions.
Replies show that compared with other Americans, journalists are more likely to live in upscale neighborhoods, have maids, own Mercedeses, and trade stocks, and they’re less likely to go to church, do volunteer work, or put down roots in a community.
Reporters tend to be part of a broadly defined social and cultural elite, so their work tends to reflect the conventional values of this elite. The astonishing distrust of the news media isn’t rooted in inaccuracy or poor reportorial skills but in the daily clash of world views between reporters and their readers.
This is an explosive situation for any industry, particularly a declining one. Here is a troubled business that keeps hiring employees whose attitudes vastly annoy the customers. Then it sponsors lots of symposiums and a credibility project dedicated to wondering why customers are annoyed and fleeing in large numbers. But it never seems to get around to noticing the cultural and class biases that so many former buyers are complaining about. If it did, it would open up its diversity program, now focused narrowly on race and gender, and look for reporters who differ broadly by outlook, values, education, and class.
59．What is the passage mainly about?
［A］needs of the readers all over the world
［B］causes of the public disappointment about newspapers
［C］origins of the declining newspaper industry
［D］aims of a journalism credibility project
60．The results of the journalism credibility project turned out to be .
［A］quite trustworthy［B］somewhat contradictory
［C］very illuminating［D］rather superficial
61．The basic problem of journalists as pointed out by the writer lies in their .
［A］working attitude［B］conventional lifestyle
［C］world outlook［D］educational background
62．Despite its efforts, the newspaper industry still cannot satisfy the readers owing to its .
［A］failure to realize its real problem ［B］tendency to hire annoying reporters
［C］likeliness to do inaccurate reporting［D］prejudice in matters of race and gender
核心詞匯：
astonish ［E5stCniF］vt.使驚訝，使吃驚
backbone［5bAkbEun］n.脊椎, 中樞, 骨干, 支柱, 意志力, 勇氣, 毅力, 決心,主干(back+bone)
bias［5baiEs］n./v.（使有）偏見,偏心,偏袒（bi 二+as 名詞后綴→有兩種觀點→偏見
contradictory［7kCntrE5diktEri］a.矛盾的，對立的（contradict反駁+ory形容詞后綴）
conventional［kEn5venFEnEl］a.慣例的,常規(guī)的（convention+al）newsroom（編輯室；閱覽室）←news+room。
credibility［9kredi5biliti］n.可信性(cred+ibility)，cred詞根“相信”（如credit→cred+it→信用），ibility名詞后綴“可……性”（如ability←a+（i）bility）
dedicate［5dedikeit］vt.奉獻;獻身于（de加強+dic說+ate動詞后綴→反復說→致力于）
elite［ei5li:t］n.<法>［集合名詞］精華;精銳;中堅分子（e出+lit=lig選+e 名詞后綴→選出的人→精英人物）
factual［5fAktFEl］a.事實的, 實際的
gender［5dVendE］n.（生理上的）性；（名詞、代詞等的）性（gen+der名詞后綴）
illuminating［i5lju:mi9neitiN］a.照明的；啟發(fā)的(illuminat（e）+ing形容詞后綴)，illuminate（照明；啟發(fā)）可看作illumin+ate，illumin諧音“一路明”，ate動詞后綴，“使”“一路明”→照明→引申為“啟發(fā)”。
metropolitan［metrE5pClitEn］a.首都的,主要都市的,大城市
plug［plQg］n.塞子,插頭v.堵,塞,插上,插栓
questionnaire［kwestFE5nZE］n.調(diào)查表，問卷（question+aire）
scratch［skrAtF］v.抓,搔,扒n.抓,搔,抓痕;起跑線
sponsor［5spCnsE］n.發(fā)起人,主辦,保證人v.發(fā)起,主辦(spons許諾+or名詞后綴→發(fā)起人；主辦方；保證人)
superficial［sju:pE5fiFEl］a.表面的;膚淺的,淺薄的（super在……上面+fic +ial形容詞后綴→在表面→膚淺的）
survey［sE:5vei］v./n.俯瞰,眺望;全面審視,調(diào)查;測量圖,勘定
symposium［sim5pEuzjEm］n.討論會; 專題論文，專題論文集(sym共同，相同+pos放+ium→放在一起討論→專題討論)
template［5templit］n.模板(templ（e）+ate)，temple寺廟，ate吃，當今傾向于素食者日益增多，而temple是ate素的“模板”（template）。
volunteer［9vClEn5tiE］n./v.自愿（者,兵）;自愿（提供）（volunt+eer人→意愿的人→志愿者）