２ 反駁型，就是對(duì)題目的觀點(diǎn)完全鄙視，直接抽他，這種比較容易寫(xiě)．（但仍然記得，即使論斷是錯(cuò)的，也不可能一無(wú)是處，還是應(yīng)該稍微提一下他的對(duì)的地方，表明你思維的判斷力和辨證性）
129. “Instead of relying on the advice of outside experts, organizations should place greater value on the advice that can come only from their own highly experienced employees.”(我的觀點(diǎn)是都應(yīng)該聽(tīng)，分場(chǎng)合聽(tīng)，分側(cè)重點(diǎn)聽(tīng)）
２．１
開(kāi)頭(比較容易寫(xiě)，直接復(fù)述就ok） The author argues that 啥啥啥．Posed this way,the author assumes that員工牛比，外面的聲音沒(méi)用（這個(gè)寫(xiě)法是相當(dāng)于把題目改了一下更適合于攻擊，把他極端化呵呵，同時(shí)posed this way這種變換的句市也是受gmat歡迎的） 自己的觀點(diǎn) while 員工應(yīng)該用在specific loophole,以及提升 工藝效率等方面，外部專家的意見(jiàn)對(duì) 企業(yè)的戰(zhàn)略和 長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展是有極大作用的．（開(kāi)頭對(duì)后面的２段有提示作用，顯示結(jié)構(gòu)的清晰）
２.2On one hand員工意見(jiàn)好，有啥作用（總論）１，２，３ 缺點(diǎn)１，２ 最后總結(jié)，適合在企業(yè)啥啥時(shí)用
２.３on the other hand 企業(yè)外部意見(jiàn)好，有啥作用（總論）好處１，２，３ 最后總結(jié)適合的場(chǎng)合
總結(jié)．．．
呵呵，這個(gè)題目不是太典型，我找一個(gè)更典型的． ai132
132. “Governments should not be responsible for regulating businesses and other organizations. Instead, society would benefit if the organizations themselves assumed responsibility for establishing and enforcing their own standards and regulations.”
開(kāi)頭The author claims that ….. Posed this way, the author means that 政府沒(méi)責(zé)任．on the contrary ,government should instead take the major responsibility.（論點(diǎn)）
中間
１，先談?wù)娜毕荩ㄟm當(dāng)?shù)谋砻髯约旱纳疃?，咱可沒(méi)一位說(shuō)政府好，要企業(yè)一邊去，政府也有不好）
1,admittedly, government regulation seems costly and low-efficient since 政府需要很多 external data provider 來(lái)了解不同的行業(yè)，制訂不同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，much later than …特別是工業(yè)領(lǐng)域，排放pollutants這里。
２談?wù)词褂腥毕葸€是應(yīng)該用政府，因?yàn)槠髽I(yè)的句大缺陷，和政府的優(yōu)勢(shì)．
2 however,這個(gè)缺陷的存在 cannot rationalize（使合理化） the self-regulation.
因?yàn)樯渡渡叮?，２，３公司目?biāo)，利潤(rùn)花，市場(chǎng)market value 化，監(jiān)管目標(biāo)是保證公司運(yùn)作是符合社會(huì)要求的，in accordance with the social welfare in general. Contradicts,liable to fraud.比如 manufacturer responsible to set standards for emitting polluting gas,the residue of certain process, would find that compliance with generally-accepted standards too costly .
同時(shí)，企業(yè)不可能根據(jù)自身行業(yè)的perspective 來(lái)制訂standards.缺乏獨(dú)立性，不能保證regulation implemented. 所以必須由第3方政府監(jiān)管
129. “Instead of relying on the advice of outside experts, organizations should place greater value on the advice that can come only from their own highly experienced employees.”(我的觀點(diǎn)是都應(yīng)該聽(tīng)，分場(chǎng)合聽(tīng)，分側(cè)重點(diǎn)聽(tīng)）
２．１
開(kāi)頭(比較容易寫(xiě)，直接復(fù)述就ok） The author argues that 啥啥啥．Posed this way,the author assumes that員工牛比，外面的聲音沒(méi)用（這個(gè)寫(xiě)法是相當(dāng)于把題目改了一下更適合于攻擊，把他極端化呵呵，同時(shí)posed this way這種變換的句市也是受gmat歡迎的） 自己的觀點(diǎn) while 員工應(yīng)該用在specific loophole,以及提升 工藝效率等方面，外部專家的意見(jiàn)對(duì) 企業(yè)的戰(zhàn)略和 長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展是有極大作用的．（開(kāi)頭對(duì)后面的２段有提示作用，顯示結(jié)構(gòu)的清晰）
２.2On one hand員工意見(jiàn)好，有啥作用（總論）１，２，３ 缺點(diǎn)１，２ 最后總結(jié)，適合在企業(yè)啥啥時(shí)用
２.３on the other hand 企業(yè)外部意見(jiàn)好，有啥作用（總論）好處１，２，３ 最后總結(jié)適合的場(chǎng)合
總結(jié)．．．
呵呵，這個(gè)題目不是太典型，我找一個(gè)更典型的． ai132
132. “Governments should not be responsible for regulating businesses and other organizations. Instead, society would benefit if the organizations themselves assumed responsibility for establishing and enforcing their own standards and regulations.”
開(kāi)頭The author claims that ….. Posed this way, the author means that 政府沒(méi)責(zé)任．on the contrary ,government should instead take the major responsibility.（論點(diǎn)）
中間
１，先談?wù)娜毕荩ㄟm當(dāng)?shù)谋砻髯约旱纳疃?，咱可沒(méi)一位說(shuō)政府好，要企業(yè)一邊去，政府也有不好）
1,admittedly, government regulation seems costly and low-efficient since 政府需要很多 external data provider 來(lái)了解不同的行業(yè)，制訂不同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，much later than …特別是工業(yè)領(lǐng)域，排放pollutants這里。
２談?wù)词褂腥毕葸€是應(yīng)該用政府，因?yàn)槠髽I(yè)的句大缺陷，和政府的優(yōu)勢(shì)．
2 however,這個(gè)缺陷的存在 cannot rationalize（使合理化） the self-regulation.
因?yàn)樯渡渡叮?，２，３公司目?biāo)，利潤(rùn)花，市場(chǎng)market value 化，監(jiān)管目標(biāo)是保證公司運(yùn)作是符合社會(huì)要求的，in accordance with the social welfare in general. Contradicts,liable to fraud.比如 manufacturer responsible to set standards for emitting polluting gas,the residue of certain process, would find that compliance with generally-accepted standards too costly .
同時(shí)，企業(yè)不可能根據(jù)自身行業(yè)的perspective 來(lái)制訂standards.缺乏獨(dú)立性，不能保證regulation implemented. 所以必須由第3方政府監(jiān)管