綜合寫作：
Sample answer:
The reading and listening discuss about mysterious prints reported in an English newspaper. The reading points out three hypotheses to explain the mysterious prints. Whereas, the professor totally refutes the three points presented inthe passage.
Firstly, the professor rebuts the reading’s idea that this was kangaroo footprint. The professor claims that Kangaroo’s sharp and powerful claws would make deep marks during long trails. And if the footprints were left by the fleeing kangaroo, theremust have been reports about this incident, but there wasn’t.
Secondly, the professor contradicts reading’s second hypothesis that it was made by hot airballoon, which can be demonstrated by the broken rope andblots. The professor mentions that there was a forest area in the way, and thehot air balloon would be entangled by tree branches and could not travel that long distance.
At last, the passage states that the whole story was invented although reported trust worthy.However, the professor explains that the report wasbased on reliable materials. For one thing, there’sletter from Devin who found the footprints; for another thing, newspaper office collected a lotof details about the print. Thus the report wouldn’t be invented.
獨(dú)立寫作：
| Topic 議題：mysterious prints reported in an English newspaper | ||
| Reading | Listening | |
| Thesis 總論點(diǎn) | The reading points out three hypotheses to explain the mysterious prints. | Refute the three explanations mentioned in reading passage. |
Sub-point 1 分論點(diǎn)1 | This was kangaroo footprint. | Kangaroo’s sharp and powerful claws would make deep marks during long trails. And if the footprints were left by the fleeing kangaroo, there must have been reports about this incident, but there wasn’t. |
Sub-point2 分論點(diǎn)2 | It was made by hot air balloon, which can be demonstrated by the broken rope and blots. | There was a forest area in the way, and the hot air balloon would be entangled by tree branches and could not travel that long distance. |
Sub-point 3 分論點(diǎn)3 | The whole story was invented although reported trustworthy. | The report was based on reliable materials. For one thing, there’sletter from Devin who found the footprints; for another thing, newspaper office collected a lot of details about the print. Thus the report wouldn’t be invented. |
Sample answer:
The reading and listening discuss about mysterious prints reported in an English newspaper. The reading points out three hypotheses to explain the mysterious prints. Whereas, the professor totally refutes the three points presented inthe passage.
Firstly, the professor rebuts the reading’s idea that this was kangaroo footprint. The professor claims that Kangaroo’s sharp and powerful claws would make deep marks during long trails. And if the footprints were left by the fleeing kangaroo, theremust have been reports about this incident, but there wasn’t.
Secondly, the professor contradicts reading’s second hypothesis that it was made by hot airballoon, which can be demonstrated by the broken rope andblots. The professor mentions that there was a forest area in the way, and thehot air balloon would be entangled by tree branches and could not travel that long distance.
At last, the passage states that the whole story was invented although reported trust worthy.However, the professor explains that the report wasbased on reliable materials. For one thing, there’sletter from Devin who found the footprints; for another thing, newspaper office collected a lotof details about the print. Thus the report wouldn’t be invented.
獨(dú)立寫作：
| 作文題目： | Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies are worth watching only when they teach something about real life. |
| 題型類別: | 事實(shí)類 |
| 寫作思路： | 這是一道老題，重復(fù)2011年8月的寫作題。 題目不難，非常典型的絕對詞題目，建議大家選擇disagree。 解題方式：承合駁絕（承認(rèn)合理性，駁斥絕對性）。 考生們?nèi)绻X得有難度，主要問題在于例子上面。針對此題，同學(xué)們不好自己編造例子，是建立在實(shí)實(shí)在在的電影的基礎(chǔ)上的。很多同學(xué)在考場上發(fā)現(xiàn)不會寫電影名稱、演員或者劇中人物的名字。導(dǎo)致想用的例子卻用不了，所以提醒各位考生一句，寫作要好，平時(shí)的積累一定要足，同時(shí)要勤練筆，將寫作融入到自己的生活中，這樣方能扎扎實(shí)實(shí)地提高～ |
| 寫作指導(dǎo)： | Main point: Disagree Reason1. 承認(rèn)現(xiàn)實(shí)電影的可看性，有好處，但是并不是值得看的電影。 Undeniably, it is beneficial for a movie when it focuses on realism. (承認(rèn)合理性)That kind of movie usually reflects our actual life or exposes the hardship and misfortune some people are going through. (適當(dāng)解釋合理性)For example, the documentary movie “Tears in Africa” presents cruel life situations occurring in Africa which can move all of us to give aid to Africans. (舉例說明)However, if we simply pay attention to this type of movie, it may create so much stress in our lives that we ordinary people could not bear it very long.(駁斥) Reason2. 很多人因?yàn)橄矏垭娪袄锩娴脑囟措娪?，比如喜歡的明星，高超的特技效果等。 例如，我非常喜歡高科技元素，我就會去看X-MEN, TRANSFORMERS, IRON MAN, Harry Port等;比如我非常喜歡小李子(Leonardo)，他的電影我就一定要去看。無論是高科技元素還是演員精湛的演技都會讓我們從中受益。 Reason3. 只看反映現(xiàn)實(shí)類的電影讓人stressed out。以Aftershock(唐山大地震)為例，看完之后整個(gè)人情緒非常低落。 |
點(diǎn)擊免費(fèi)試聽>>> | 點(diǎn)擊免費(fèi)試聽>>> |
點(diǎn)擊免費(fèi)試聽>>> |