SAT閱讀長(zhǎng)難句舉例學(xué)習(xí)

字號(hào):

SAT閱讀長(zhǎng)難句的學(xué)習(xí)難點(diǎn)就是,即使你認(rèn)識(shí)了每一個(gè)單詞,也不代表你對(duì)這個(gè)句子就深刻理解了。在SAT閱讀長(zhǎng)難句分析中我們會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn),對(duì)句子里的每一個(gè)詞都很熟悉,但卻還是不知道整個(gè)句子到底要說(shuō)些什么,這都是因?yàn)槲覀儗?duì)句子結(jié)構(gòu)及部分詞組不熟悉造成。因此,我們強(qiáng)烈建議考生們?cè)谌缙芐AT閱讀以前先來(lái)解決長(zhǎng)難句的學(xué)習(xí)。我們來(lái)看下面5個(gè)SAT閱讀長(zhǎng)難句解析。
    1. Such variations in size, shape,chemistry, conduction speed, excitation threshold,and the like as had been demonstrated in nerve cells remained negligible in significance for any  possible correlation with the manifold dimensions of mental experience.(難度系數(shù)5)難免類型:復(fù)雜修飾
    譯文:類似于這些已經(jīng)被在神經(jīng)細(xì)胞中證明的在大小、形狀、化學(xué)過(guò)程、產(chǎn)生的速度、興奮閾值及其類似的方面上所發(fā)生變化,當(dāng)他們被用來(lái)與大腦的體驗(yàn)以可能的方式聯(lián)系起來(lái)的時(shí)候,他們?cè)谥匾陨先匀皇俏⒉蛔愕赖摹?BR>    2. It was possible to demonstrate by other methods refined structural differences among neuron types ; however , proof was lacking that the quality of the impulse or its condition was influenced by these differences , which seemed instead to influence the developmental patterning of the neural circuits .(難度系數(shù)5) 有可能通過(guò)其他方法來(lái)證明神經(jīng)元種類間的細(xì)微的結(jié)構(gòu)差異;可是,這樣的證據(jù)是缺乏的,即神經(jīng)沖動(dòng)的性質(zhì)或者狀態(tài)是受這些差異所影響的,而這些差異看起來(lái)卻能影響神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的發(fā)育模式。
    3. Although qualitative variance among nerve energies was never rigidly disproved,the doctrine was generally abandoned in favor of the opposing view,namely,that nerve impulses are essentially homogeneous in quality and are transmitted as "common currency" throughout the nervous system. (難度系數(shù)4) 盡管在神經(jīng)能量上存在著質(zhì)的不同,這一點(diǎn)從來(lái)都沒(méi)有在嚴(yán)格的意義上被反對(duì)過(guò),但是以上教條通常被拋棄掉,而轉(zhuǎn)向相反的觀點(diǎn),即:神經(jīng)沖動(dòng)從根本上本質(zhì)相同,而且被當(dāng)作“一種普通流”在整個(gè)神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)中傳播。難句類型:復(fù)雜修飾、雙重否定
    4. Other experiments revealed slight variations in the size,number,arrangement,and interconnection of the nerve cells,but as far as psycho neural correlations were concerned,the obvious similarities of these sensory fields to each other seemed much more remarkable than any of the minute differences. (難度系數(shù)4 -)盡管其他實(shí)驗(yàn)顯示在神經(jīng)細(xì)胞的大小、數(shù)量、排列和相互連接上有一些小的差異,但是就心理-神經(jīng)的關(guān)系而言,這些感官區(qū)域彼此之間的明顯的相似性看起來(lái)比起微小的差異更為令人注目。難句類型:復(fù)雜修飾、插入語(yǔ)
    5. Although some experiments show that,as an object becomes familiar,its internal representation becomes more holistic and the recognition process correspondingly more parallel,the weight of evidence seems to support the serial hypothesis,at least for objects that are not notably simple and familiar. (難度系數(shù)4+)雖然某些實(shí)驗(yàn)表明,隨著一個(gè)物體變得熟悉起來(lái),其內(nèi)心再現(xiàn)圖像亦更具整體感,辨認(rèn)過(guò)程相應(yīng)地更趨于平行,但證據(jù)的砝碼似乎在支持序列假設(shè) (serial hypothesis),至少是對(duì)于那些不甚簡(jiǎn)單、不甚熟悉的物體來(lái)說(shuō)。難句類型:復(fù)雜修飾、插入語(yǔ)、省略
    SAT閱讀長(zhǎng)難句學(xué)習(xí)起來(lái)確實(shí)很難,但我們不是束手無(wú)策,只要我們樹立信心,找準(zhǔn)方向,也能找到合適的入口突破SAT閱讀長(zhǎng)難句分析。