為了方便大家的學(xué)習(xí)，順利通過雅思考試，為大家精心整理了雅思考官級9分范文：動物實驗利弊，供大家參考！將為大家發(fā)布最新、最專業(yè)的雅思考試機(jī)經(jīng)及解析，歡迎參考閱讀。
題目是Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and
to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments
should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while
others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.Discuss both
views and give your own opinion.
范文：
It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on
animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the
viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a
limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.
On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal
experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may
be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured.
Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to
this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected.
They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused,
and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.
On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not
always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research
believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be
justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research
might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical
treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation.
Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products,
but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical
procedures are concerned.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on
animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have
been developed.
題目是Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and
to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments
should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while
others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.Discuss both
views and give your own opinion.
范文：
It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on
animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the
viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a
limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.
On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal
experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may
be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured.
Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to
this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected.
They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused,
and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.
On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not
always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research
believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be
justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research
might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical
treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation.
Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products,
but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical
procedures are concerned.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on
animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have
been developed.